Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Tucker v. MGM Resorts International, Operations Inc., 18-cv-00443-GMN-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180810b37 Visitors: 7
Filed: Aug. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE THE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, KARLA TUCKER ("TUCKER"), by and through her attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendant, MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ("DEFENDANT"), by and through its attorney, SANDRA KETNER, ESQ., of LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. and hereby stipulates and agrees as follows: 1. That the Early Neutral Evaluation in the above referen
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO VACATE THE EARLY NEUTRAL EVALUATION

COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, KARLA TUCKER ("TUCKER"), by and through her attorney, JENNY L. FOLEY, Ph.D., ESQ., of the law firm HKM EMPLOYMENT ATTORNEYS LLP, and Defendant, MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL, INC., ("DEFENDANT"), by and through its attorney, SANDRA KETNER, ESQ., of LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. and hereby stipulates and agrees as follows:

1. That the Early Neutral Evaluation in the above referenced case currently set for August 22, 2018, be rescheduled until after September 4, 2018. The reason for the stay is that the Plaintiff daughter's is ill and Plaintiff needs to attend to family matters surrounding her.

2. The parties' stipulation for a stay is not intended to have any effect on the Court's orderly review and disposition of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 16), Defendant's Answer to Amended Complaint (ECF No. 17), or any other motions that may be filed by either party during the stay.

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the foregoing STIPULATION AND ORDER TO STAY LITIGATION in the above-entitled matter and for good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS SO ORDERED that the Early Neutral Evaluation in the above referenced case is rescheduled until after September 4, 2018, unless otherwise deemed sooner by Plaintiff and Defense counsel and by the Court's calendar.

IT IS SO ORDERED The parties' stipulation for a stay is not intended to have any effect on the Court's orderly review and disposition of Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 16), Defendant's Answer to Amended Complaint (ECF No. 17), or any other motions that may be filed by either party during the stay.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer