Reno v. Western Cab Company, 2:18-cv-840-APG-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180815f36
Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 13, 2018
Summary: EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF NO. 21) AND TO DEEM MOTIONS TO DISMISS APPLICABLE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiffs Michael Reno and Eric Kiefaber ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Western Cab Company, Helen Tobman Martin, Marilyn Tobman Moran, Janie Tobman Moore, and Martha Sarver ("these Defendants"), through their counsel of record, hereby stip
Summary: EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF NO. 21) AND TO DEEM MOTIONS TO DISMISS APPLICABLE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiffs Michael Reno and Eric Kiefaber ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Western Cab Company, Helen Tobman Martin, Marilyn Tobman Moran, Janie Tobman Moore, and Martha Sarver ("these Defendants"), through their counsel of record, hereby stipu..
More
EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO EXTEND PLAINTIFFS' TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SANCTIONS (ECF NO. 21) AND TO DEEM MOTIONS TO DISMISS APPLICABLE TO FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Michael Reno and Eric Kiefaber ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Western Cab Company, Helen Tobman Martin, Marilyn Tobman Moran, Janie Tobman Moore, and Martha Sarver ("these Defendants"), through their counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension of time for Plaintiffs to file their response to these Defendants' motion for sanctions, ECF No. 21. Such motion was filed on August 9, 2018, with a response in opposition being due on August 23, 2018. The parties agree Plaintiffs will have until September 13, 2018 to file their response in opposition to this motion.
The parties further stipulate and agree that these Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 9 and 10), the Opposition (ECF No. 20) and the Reply (ECF No. 22) shall be deemed to apply to the First Amended Complaint filed by plaintiffs on August 1, 2018 (ECF No. 17). The parties agree that the briefing on the motions to dismiss the First Amended Complaint is complete and the motions to dismiss are ready for the Court's decision.
The extension requested herein is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
