Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Santilli, 2:16-cr-00046-GMN-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180816879 Visitors: 16
Filed: Jul. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between defendant, PETER T. SANTILLI by and through his counsel, CHRIS T. RASMUSSEN, ESQ., and the United States America, by its counsel, DANIEL SCHIESS, that the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for August 9, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. be vacated and continued until September 11, 2018 at any time suitable to the court. This Stipulation is entered into for the following reaso
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between defendant, PETER T. SANTILLI by and through his counsel, CHRIS T. RASMUSSEN, ESQ., and the United States America, by its counsel, DANIEL SCHIESS, that the above-captioned matter currently scheduled for August 9, 2018 at 9:00 a.m. be vacated and continued until September 11, 2018 at any time suitable to the court.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The parties agree to a continuance;

2. Counsel for the Defendant has spoken to the Defendant and the Defendant has no objection to this continuance;

3. Counsel for the Defendant needs additional time to prepare for sentencing;

4. Denial of this request could result in a miscarriage of justice;

5. For all the above- stated reasons, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the sentencing date;

6. This is the fourth request for continuance.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing, the Court finds that:

1. The parties agree to a continuance;

2. Counsel for the Defendant has spoken to the Defendant and the Defendant has no objection to this continuance;

3. Counsel for the Defendant needs additional time to prepare for sentencing;

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. Denial of this request would result in a miscarriage of justice.

2. For all the above-stated reason, the ends of justice would best be served by a continuance of the sentencing date until September 11, 2018.

3. This is the fourth request for continuance.

ORDER

Accordingly, IT IS SO ORDERED that the sentencing currently scheduled for August 9, 2018 at the hour of 9:00 a.m., by vacated and continued to September 11, 2018, at the hour of 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 7D before Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer