Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McIntosh v. Titanium Metals Corporation, 2:18-cv-01368-JAD-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180817f93 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [FIRST REQUEST] CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Hubert M. McIntosh ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Titanium Metals Corporation and Precision Castparts Corp. (collectively, "Defendants") hereby stipulate to an extension of time up to and including September 4, 2018 in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. A response to the Complaint is currently due August 20, 2018. This is th
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT

[FIRST REQUEST]

Plaintiff Hubert M. McIntosh ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Titanium Metals Corporation and Precision Castparts Corp. (collectively, "Defendants") hereby stipulate to an extension of time up to and including September 4, 2018 in which to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. A response to the Complaint is currently due August 20, 2018.

This is the first request for an extension of time to respond to the Complaint. This request is sought in good faith and not for purposes of delay. The parties are currently discussing the dismissal of Defendant Precision Castparts Corp., and Plaintiff's counsel needs time to consider this request and consult with her client.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer