Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Plinski v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., : 2:18-cv-01342-GMN-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180817g14 Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Michael J. Plinski and Audrey McClure-Plinski (hereafter "Plaintiffs") through their attorney Erik W. Fox, Esq., and Lindsey H. Morales, Esq., attorney for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (hereafter "Chase") that Defendant Chase may have additional time within which to a
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiffs Michael J. Plinski and Audrey McClure-Plinski (hereafter "Plaintiffs") through their attorney Erik W. Fox, Esq., and Lindsey H. Morales, Esq., attorney for Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., (hereafter "Chase") that Defendant Chase may have additional time within which to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Specifically, the parties have agreed to extend Defendant's time to respond; therefore, Defendant may answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before September 12, 2018.

The parties further agree that good cause exists for this extension. The amended response deadline allows Defendant to continue investigating the matter and for the parties to continue their productive discussions regarding the dispute.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint on or before September 12, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer