Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hof v. Nye County, 2:18-cv-00211-RFB-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180820d39 Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties that Discovery and Scheduling order [Doc. #13} in Case No. 2:18-cv-01492-GMN-NJK be amended and that the deadlines be extended for a period of 60 days from the date of the filing this stipulation. This Request for extension is done for good cause and not for purposes of delay. 1. Reasons why Discovery Deadlines
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DISCOVERY DEADLINES

(First Request)

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties that Discovery and Scheduling order [Doc. #13} in Case No. 2:18-cv-01492-GMN-NJK be amended and that the deadlines be extended for a period of 60 days from the date of the filing this stipulation. This Request for extension is done for good cause and not for purposes of delay.

1. Reasons why Discovery Deadlines Should be Extended.

The Parties have spent several weeks negotiating the details of a previously agreed upon early mediation. However, there has been a substantial change in circumstances, and the parties are now at an impasse regarding mediating a settlement. Due to the good faith mediation talks, neither party has propounded discovery.

2. Discovery Completed to Date

To date the Parties have not completed any discovery other than the exchange of initial disclosures.

3. Discovery Remaining to be Completed

a. Written discovery needs to be propounded upon the Defendants. b. Written discovery needs to be propounded upon the Plaintiffs. c. Depositions of the Parties, possible witnesses, and experts need to be set. d. Expert disclosures need to be propounded upon the Defendants. e. Expert disclosures need to be propounded upon the Plaintiffs.

4. Reason(s) Why Discovery has not been Completed

The parties have been engaged in good faith mediation talks and delayed taking discovery in favor of hopefully mediating and settling this case. The Parties agreed to mediation and had already agreed upon conditions and potential mediators. The Parties further discussed staying discovery pending the mediation. However, there has recently been a substantial change of circumstances. Plaintiffs filed a new civil rights complaint and moved for a temporary restraining order against many of the same named Defendants on August 10, 2018. This new case is in addition to a second civil rights complaint that Plaintiffs filed against many of the same Defendants on June 9, 2018. Plaintiffs assert new claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the following cases:

Hof v. Nye County, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01492

Hof v. Nye County, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01050

Plaintiffs filed its most recent civil rights complaint last week alleging violations of Plaintiffs' Fourteen and First Amendment rights.

Accordingly, mediation talks have broken down and now neither Party wishes to mediate at this time.

Further, the extensive hearing and briefing schedule of the Parties' counsel resulted in difficulty meeting with the Parties' respective clients to discuss and work on interrogatories and requests for production to the other party. For example, the extensive briefing in the new civil rights cases for both Parties has made it difficult to collect evidence for the first case.

The Parties respectfully submit that this constitutes a compelling reason for the extension on discovery deadlines in this case.

5. Discovery Cut-Off Date: The Defendants filed their Answer on April 16, 2018. The Discovery time period is normally 180 days, but with the 60-day extension, the Parties agree that the Discovery cut-off date shall be Wednesday, December 12, 2018.

6. Last Date to Disclose Experts: The deadlines in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) for expert disclosures are modified to require that the disclosures be made 60 days before the discovery cut-off date. Because October 13, 2018 falls on a Saturday, the last date to disclose experts is Monday, October 15, 2018.

7. Deadline for Rebuttal-Expert Disclosures: Disclosures identifying rebuttal experts shall be made 30 days after the disclosure of experts and no later than Monday, November 12, 2018.

8. Dispositive Motions: The filing deadline for dispositive motions is 30 days after the discovery cut-off date. Thus, the deadline shall be Friday, January 11, 2019.

9. Motions in Limine/Daubert Motions

Under LR 16-3(b), any motions in limine, including Daubert type motions, shall be filed and served 30 days prior to the commencement of trial and oppositions shall be filed and served 15 days thereafter. Reply briefs will only be allowed with leave of the Court.

10. Deadline for Joint- Pretrial Order: Pursuant to LR26(1)(e)(5) the Joint Pretrial Order shall be filed by February 10, 2019, 30 days after the dispositive-motion deadline. Since February 10, 2019 is a Sunday, the parties agree that the deadline is Monday, February 11, 2019. In the event that dispositive motions are filed, the date for filing the joint pretrial order shall be suspended until the Court issues its decision on any dispositive motions or further order of the court. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections shall be included in the final pretrial order, and must be filed at least 30 days prior to trial in accordance with FRCP 26(a)(3)(B).

11. Interim Status Report: In accordance with LR 26-3, the parties shall file the interim status report by October 13, 2018 which is 60 days prior to the discovery cut-off date. Because October 13, 2018 is a Saturday, the deadline shall be Monday, October 15, 2018.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer