GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties that Discovery and Scheduling order [Doc. #13} in Case No. 2:18-cv-01492-GMN-NJK be amended and that the deadlines be extended for a period of 60 days from the date of the filing this stipulation. This Request for extension is done for good cause and not for purposes of delay.
The Parties have spent several weeks negotiating the details of a previously agreed upon early mediation. However, there has been a substantial change in circumstances, and the parties are now at an impasse regarding mediating a settlement. Due to the good faith mediation talks, neither party has propounded discovery.
To date the Parties have not completed any discovery other than the exchange of initial disclosures.
The parties have been engaged in good faith mediation talks and delayed taking discovery in favor of hopefully mediating and settling this case. The Parties agreed to mediation and had already agreed upon conditions and potential mediators. The Parties further discussed staying discovery pending the mediation. However, there has recently been a substantial change of circumstances. Plaintiffs filed a new civil rights complaint and moved for a temporary restraining order against many of the same named Defendants on August 10, 2018. This new case is in addition to a second civil rights complaint that Plaintiffs filed against many of the same Defendants on June 9, 2018. Plaintiffs assert new claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the following cases:
Hof v. Nye County, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01492
Hof v. Nye County, et al., Case No. 2:18-cv-01050
Plaintiffs filed its most recent civil rights complaint last week alleging violations of Plaintiffs' Fourteen and First Amendment rights.
Accordingly, mediation talks have broken down and now neither Party wishes to mediate at this time.
Further, the extensive hearing and briefing schedule of the Parties' counsel resulted in difficulty meeting with the Parties' respective clients to discuss and work on interrogatories and requests for production to the other party. For example, the extensive briefing in the new civil rights cases for both Parties has made it difficult to collect evidence for the first case.
The Parties respectfully submit that this constitutes a compelling reason for the extension on discovery deadlines in this case.
6.
Under LR 16-3(b), any motions in limine, including Daubert type motions, shall be filed and served 30 days prior to the commencement of trial and oppositions shall be filed and served 15 days thereafter. Reply briefs will only be allowed with leave of the Court.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.