Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Pineda, 2:17-cr-258-APG-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180821d72 Visitors: 9
Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING (First Request) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by JOCELYN PINEDA, by and through her attorney, JAMES A. ORONOZ, ESQ., and the United States of America, by and through RICHARD ANTHONY LOPEZ, ESQ., Assistant United States Attorney, that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for August 23, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and continued at least forty-five (45) days past the current sentencing date to a date and time
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SENTENCING (First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by JOCELYN PINEDA, by and through her attorney, JAMES A. ORONOZ, ESQ., and the United States of America, by and through RICHARD ANTHONY LOPEZ, ESQ., Assistant United States Attorney, that the sentencing hearing currently scheduled for August 23, 2018, at 10:00 a.m., be vacated and continued at least forty-five (45) days past the current sentencing date to a date and time that is convenient to this Honorable Court.

The request for a continuance is based upon the following:

1. Counsel for Defendant Pineda recently suffered an injury to his arm that required surgery. Counsel is still in the process of recovering from the surgery and requires additional time to complete tasks necessary to prepare for Ms. Pineda's sentencing. 2. Defendant JOCELYN PINEDA is in custody, and she has no objection to the continuance. 3. Defense Counsel for JOCELYN PINEDA, has spoken to AUSA Richard Anthony Lopez, and he agrees to the continuance. 4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay. 5. The additional time requested by this Stipulation to Continue Sentencing is reasonable pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(b)(2), which states that the "court may, for good cause, change any time limits prescribed by this rule." 6. This is the first stipulation to continue the sentencing hearing filed herein. 7. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds:

1. Counsel for Defendant Pineda recently suffered an injury to his arm that required surgery. Counsel is still in the process of recovering from the surgery and requires additional time to complete tasks necessary to prepare for Ms. Pineda's sentencing. 2. Defendant JOCELYN PINEDA is in custody, and she has no objection to the continuance. 3. Defense Counsel for JOCELYN PINEDA, has spoken to AUSA Richard Anthony Lopez, and he agrees to the continuance. 4. The additional time requested herein is not sought for purposes of delay. 5. The additional time requested by this Stipulation to Continue Sentencing is reasonable pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 32(b)(2), which states that the "court may, for good cause, change any time limits prescribed by this rule." 6. This is the first stipulation to continue the sentencing hearing filed herein. 7. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interests of the public in proceeding with the sentencing hearing as scheduled, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice at the sentencing hearing, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the sentencing currently scheduled for August 23, 2018, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. be vacated and continued to the 9th day of October, 2018, at the hour of 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 6C.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer