Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Voip-Pal.com, Inc. v. AT&T Corp., 2:18-cv-01129 (RCJ) (VCF). (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180821d81 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS ROBERT C. JONES , District Judge . Before the Court is the Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant AT&T Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. After careful consideration, the Court finds good cause exists to grant the requested relief. Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant AT&
More

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

Before the Court is the Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant AT&T Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. After careful consideration, the Court finds good cause exists to grant the requested relief. Plaintiff VoIP-Pal's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendant AT&T Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint is GRANTED as follows:

1. Plaintiff VoIP-Pal shall have up to and including September 6, 2018 to respond to Defendant AT&T Corp.'s Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer