Pauli v. CIT Bank, N.A., 2:17-cv-01556-APG-PAL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180821d96
Visitors: 10
Filed: Aug. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CIT BANK'S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND TO EXTEND MOVANT'S DEADLINE TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES (FIRST REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff, Kathryn Pauli and Defendant CIT Bank ("CIT"), by and through their undersigned counse
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CIT BANK'S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND TO EXTEND MOVANT'S DEADLINE TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES (FIRST REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff, Kathryn Pauli and Defendant CIT Bank ("CIT"), by and through their undersigned counsel..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CIT BANK'S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES AND TO EXTEND MOVANT'S DEADLINE TO FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES
(FIRST REQUEST)
PEGGY A. LEEN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Plaintiff, Kathryn Pauli and Defendant CIT Bank ("CIT"), by and through their undersigned counsel of record as follows:
(1) This is the first request for an extension of time for Plaintiff to file her Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement and Request for Attorney's Fees ("Motion").
(2) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion, [ECF No. 39], is due Thursday, August 16, 2018.
(3) Defendant agrees, based upon Plaintiff's counsel's prescheduled vacation to give Plaintiff until August 24, 2018 to file her Opposition to Defendant's Motion.
(4) Plaintiff, in return, agrees to give Defendant an extension to file its Reply through September 6, 2018.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
