Filed: Aug. 20, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Amy L. Gonzalez, through her attorneys, Jamie S. Cogburn, Esq., and Erik W. Fox, Esq., of the Cogburn Law Offices, and Defendant Henderson Chevrolet Co., through its attorney, L. Christopher Rose, Esq., of the law firm of Jolley Urga Woodbury Holthus & Rose, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Defendant Henderson Chevrolet Co. was served with a Co
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT (First Request) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Amy L. Gonzalez, through her attorneys, Jamie S. Cogburn, Esq., and Erik W. Fox, Esq., of the Cogburn Law Offices, and Defendant Henderson Chevrolet Co., through its attorney, L. Christopher Rose, Esq., of the law firm of Jolley Urga Woodbury Holthus & Rose, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. Defendant Henderson Chevrolet Co. was served with a Com..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
(First Request)
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Amy L. Gonzalez, through her attorneys, Jamie S. Cogburn, Esq., and Erik W. Fox, Esq., of the Cogburn Law Offices, and Defendant Henderson Chevrolet Co., through its attorney, L. Christopher Rose, Esq., of the law firm of Jolley Urga Woodbury Holthus & Rose, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. Defendant Henderson Chevrolet Co. was served with a Complaint in this matter on July 30, 2018 and Defendant's response is due on August 20, 2018; and
2. The parties believe that good cause exists and additional time is necessary and appropriate for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint.
THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED BY THE PARTIES:
That the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint be extended to September 19, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
