Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. Bank National Association v. Heritage Estates Homeowners Association, 2:16-cv-01385-GMN-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180822d70 Visitors: 24
Filed: Aug. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION [FIRST REQUEST] GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff and counter-defendant U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-08, Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-08, and defendant, counter- and cross-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC stipulate as follows: 1. U.S. Bank moved for partial summary judgme
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

[FIRST REQUEST]

Plaintiff and counter-defendant U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Certificate Holders of Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust 2005-08, Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-08, and defendant, counter- and cross-claimant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC stipulate as follows:

1. U.S. Bank moved for partial summary judgment on July 23, 2018. (Doc. No. 87.)

2. SFR filed its response to U.S. Bank's partial summary judgment on August 6, 2018. (Doc. No. 90.) The deadline for U.S. Bank to file its reply in support its motion for summary judgment and in response to SFR's opposition is August 20, 2018.

3. Heritage Estates Homeowners Association filed its opposition to U.S. Bank's summary judgment motion on August 13, 2018. (Doc. No. 83.) The deadline for U.S. Bank to file its reply in support its motion for summary judgment and in response to Heritage Estates' opposition is August 27, 2018.

4. The parties stipulate to extending the deadline to file a reply in support of U.S. Bank's motion for summary judgment and in response to SFR's opposition by seven days, to August 27, 2018, to allow U.S. Bank to file one reply addressing both SFR's and Heritage Estates' oppositions.

5. This is the parties' first request to extend the reply briefing deadline, and is not made to cause delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer