Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. Jones, 2:18-CR-00008-APG-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180830f07 Visitors: 13
Filed: Aug. 29, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE OBJECTION DEADLINE ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between ROOSEVELT JONES, Defendant, by and through his counsel MICHAEL J MICELI, ESQ, and the United States of America, BRANDON JAROCH, Assistant United States Attorney, that the objections that are due on August 30, 2018 be vacated and continued for two (2) weeks or to a date and time to be set by this Honorable Court. This Stipulation is entered into for the following r
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE OBJECTION DEADLINE

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between ROOSEVELT JONES, Defendant, by and through his counsel MICHAEL J MICELI, ESQ, and the United States of America, BRANDON JAROCH, Assistant United States Attorney, that the objections that are due on August 30, 2018 be vacated and continued for two (2) weeks or to a date and time to be set by this Honorable Court.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel has spoken to the Defendant and he has no objections to the continuance. 2. Counsel has spoken to Assistant United States Attorney Brandon Jaroch and he has no opposition to the continuance. 3. Counsel for Defendant was recently appointed and needs additional time to meet with his client and go over the Report and Recommendation. 4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds:

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel has spoken to the Defendant and he has no objections to the continuance. 2. Counsel has spoken to Assistant United States Attorney Brandon Jaroch and he has no opposition to the continuance. 3. Counsel for Defendant was recently appointed and needs additional time to meet with his client and go over the Report and Recommendation. 4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that the Objections to the Report and Recommendations that are due on August 30, 2018 be vacated and continued to be due on the this ______ day14th day of September, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer