Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. William, 2:17-cr-00124-JAD-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180904b60 Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: FINDING OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that: 1. Counsel for the Defendant spoke with JAMAL WILLIAM and he has not objection to the request for continuance; 2. As indicated below, counsel for the United States has no objection to the request for continuance; 3. Defense counsel was appointed to the above-referenced matter on July
More

FINDING OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Counsel for the Defendant spoke with JAMAL WILLIAM and he has not objection to the request for continuance; 2. As indicated below, counsel for the United States has no objection to the request for continuance; 3. Defense counsel was appointed to the above-referenced matter on July 18, 2018 and received discovery on July 28, 2018; 4. Defense counsel will need additional time to properly review the discovery in the above-referenced matter to determine whether any pretrial motions are required; 5. The additional time requested herein is not sought for the purposes of delay, but to allow counsel for Defendant JAMAL WILLIAM sufficient time to effectively and thoroughly research, prepare, and determine the most appropriate defense strategy, including, whether any pretrial motions need to be filed; 6. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice; 7. This if the first request for a continuance filed herein.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The continuance sought herein is excusable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(1)(D) and Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A) considering the factors in Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(7)(B)(i) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Pretrial Motions Deadline as to JAMAL WILLIAM currently scheduled for August 31, 2018, be continued to October 8, 2018.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the government shall have to and including October 22, 2018, within which to file any and all responsive pleadings.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendants shall have to and including October 29, 2018, within which to file any and all replies to the pretrial motions.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer