Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: CONSENT JUDGMENT RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Based upon the Stipulation and Proposed Order for Entry of Consent Judgment submitted by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Seoul") and Philcor T.V. & Electronic Leasing, Inc. dba Energyavenue.com ("Philcor"), consent judgment against Philcor and in favor of Seoul is hereby entered, as follows: 1. U.S. Patent No. 9,627,435, U.S. Patent No. 9,093,627, U.S. Patent No. 9,577,157, U.S.
Summary: CONSENT JUDGMENT RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Based upon the Stipulation and Proposed Order for Entry of Consent Judgment submitted by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Seoul") and Philcor T.V. & Electronic Leasing, Inc. dba Energyavenue.com ("Philcor"), consent judgment against Philcor and in favor of Seoul is hereby entered, as follows: 1. U.S. Patent No. 9,627,435, U.S. Patent No. 9,093,627, U.S. Patent No. 9,577,157, U.S. P..
More
CONSENT JUDGMENT
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Based upon the Stipulation and Proposed Order for Entry of Consent Judgment submitted by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Seoul") and Philcor T.V. & Electronic Leasing, Inc. dba Energyavenue.com ("Philcor"), consent judgment against Philcor and in favor of Seoul is hereby entered, as follows:
1. U.S. Patent No. 9,627,435, U.S. Patent No. 9,093,627, U.S. Patent No. 9,577,157, U.S. Patent No. 7,700,960, U.S. Patent No. 8,168,988, U.S. Patent No. 8,860,331; U.S. Patent No. 8,829,552; U.S. Patent No. 8,716,946; U.S. Patent No. 9,716,210; U.S. Patent No. 7,951,626; U.S. Patent No. 9,450,155; and U.S. Patent No. 8,664,638 (collectively, "the Patents in Suit") asserted by Seoul against Philcor in this matter are not invalid.
2. Philcor has sold lighting devices and/or LED light bulbs that were manufactured by third parties and have been accused by Seoul in the above-captioned cases. Seoul contends, and Philcor does not dispute, that such lighting devices and/or LED light bulbs infringe the Patents in Suit.
3. Seoul and Philcor shall bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees.
4. This Court retains exclusive jurisdiction of this matter to enforce this Consent Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
