Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Philcor T.V. & Electronic Leasing, Inc., 2:18-cv-00383-RFB-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180904b75
Visitors: 21
Filed: Aug. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 31, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Viosys Co., Ltd. (collectively "Seoul") and Defendant Philcor T.V. & Electronic Leasing, Inc. dba Energyavenue.com ("Philcor") stipulate to entry of Consent Judgment against Philcor and in favor of Seoul on Seoul's claim of patent infringement, and any potential defenses or counterclaims, including any defense of non-infringement or invalidit
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Viosys Co., Ltd. (collectively "Seoul") and Defendant Philcor T.V. & Electronic Leasing, Inc. dba Energyavenue.com ("Philcor") stipulate to entry of Consent Judgment against Philcor and in favor of Seoul on Seoul's claim of patent infringement, and any potential defenses or counterclaims, including any defense of non-infringement or invalidity..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED ORDER] FOR ENTRY OF CONSENT JUDGMENT
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Viosys Co., Ltd. (collectively "Seoul") and Defendant Philcor T.V. & Electronic Leasing, Inc. dba Energyavenue.com ("Philcor") stipulate to entry of Consent Judgment against Philcor and in favor of Seoul on Seoul's claim of patent infringement, and any potential defenses or counterclaims, including any defense of non-infringement or invalidity. The stipulation is based upon the following:
1. Seoul alleges, and Philcor does not dispute, that Philcor has sold lighting devices and/or LED light bulbs that were manufactured by third parties and infringe U.S. Patent No. 9,627,435, U.S. Patent No. 9,093,627, U.S. Patent No. 9,577,157, U.S. Patent No. 7,700,960, U.S. Patent No. 8,168,988, U.S. Patent No. 8,860,331; U.S. Patent No. 8,829,552; U.S. Patent No. 8,716,946; U.S. Patent No. 9,716,210; U.S. Patent No. 7,951,626; U.S. Patent No. 9,450,155; and U.S. Patent No. 8,664,638 (collectively, "the Patents in Suit") that are owned by Seoul.
2. Philcor does not contest that the Patents in Suit are valid.
3. The Parties therefore agree that a Consent Judgment should be entered in favor of Seoul and against Philcor on Seoul's claim of patent infringement of the Patents in Suit.
Accordingly, the Parties stipulate and request that the Court enter the following Consent Judgment, attached hereto as Exhibit A.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Exhibit A
Consent Judgment
NICHOLAS J. SANTORO (Nev. Bar No. 532)
JASON D. SMITH (Nev. Bar No. 9691)
SANTORO WHITMIRE
10100 W. Charleston Blvd., Suite 250
Las Vegas, Nevada 89135
Tel.: (702) 948-8771 / Fax: (702) 948-8773
E-mail: nsantoro@santoronevada.com
jsmith@santoronevada.com
MICHAEL EISENBERG (pro hac vice admitted)
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
31 West 52nd Street
New York, New York 10019
Tel.: (212) 513-3529/Fax: (212) 385-9010
Email: michael.eisenberg@hklaw.com
STACEY H. WANG (pro hac vice admitted)
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
400 South Hope Street, 8th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel.: (213) 896-2400/Fax: (213) 896-2450
Email: stacey.wang@hklaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
UNITED STATES DISTRCT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD. and Case No.: 2:18-cv-00383-RFB-NJK
SEOUL VIOSYS, CO., LTD.
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Plaintiffs,
vs.
PHILCOR T.V. & ELECTRONIC LEASING,
INC. d/b/a ENERGYAVENUE.COM,
Defendants.
CONSENT JUDGMENT
Based upon the Stipulation and Proposed Order for Entry of Consent Judgment submitted by Plaintiffs Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. and Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Seoul") and Philcor T.V. & Electronic Leasing, Inc. dba Energyavenue.com ("Philcor"), consent judgment against Philcor and in favor of Seoul is hereby entered, as follows:
1. U.S. Patent No. 9,627,435, U.S. Patent No. 9,093,627, U.S. Patent No. 9,577,157, U.S. Patent No. 7,700,960, U.S. Patent No. 8,168,988, U.S. Patent No. 8,860,331; U.S. Patent No. 8,829,552; U.S. Patent No. 8,716,946; U.S. Patent No. 9,716,210; U.S. Patent No. 7,951,626; U.S. Patent No. 9,450,155; and U.S. Patent No. 8,664,638 (collectively, "the Patents in Suit") asserted by Seoul against Philcor in this matter are not invalid.
2. Philcor has sold lighting devices and/or LED light bulbs that were manufactured by third parties and have been accused by Seoul in the above-captioned cases. Seoul contends, and Philcor does not dispute, that such lighting devices and/or LED light bulbs infringe the Patents in Suit.
3. Seoul and Philcor shall bear their own costs, expenses and attorneys' fees.
4. This Court retains exclusive jurisdiction of this matter to enforce this Consent Judgment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
