Cagliari v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-00130-GMN-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180906d25
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2018
Summary: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (SECOND REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), respectfully requests a 45-day extension of time, from August 5, 2018 to October 20, 2018, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand in this case. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time. Defendant's first extension was in connection with submitting the c
Summary: DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (SECOND REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), respectfully requests a 45-day extension of time, from August 5, 2018 to October 20, 2018, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand in this case. This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time. Defendant's first extension was in connection with submitting the ce..
More
DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (SECOND REQUEST)
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security (Defendant), respectfully requests a 45-day extension of time, from August 5, 2018 to October 20, 2018, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Reversal and/or Remand in this case.
This is Defendant's second request for an extension of time. Defendant's first extension was in connection with submitting the certified administrative record. Defendant respectfully submits that good cause exists for a second extension because Defendant's counsel was out of the office unexpectedly and requires additional time to complete her review and analysis of the record and the issues raised in Plaintiff's motion and to prepare Defendant's response. Defendant's counsel also has a number of other briefs due and is trying diligently to manage competing workload demands. This request is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings. Plaintiff's counsel indicated in an email dated August 31, 2018 that he does not oppose this request for an extension.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
