HSBC Bank USA, National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:17-cv-01497-RFB-PAL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180907a63
Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1] PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7) (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR3 AKA HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for NAAC 2006-AR3 ("HSBC"), together with Defendant SF
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1] PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7) (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Plaintiff HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR3 AKA HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for NAAC 2006-AR3 ("HSBC"), together with Defendant SFR..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO SFR INVESTMENTS POOL 1, LLC'S RENEWED MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [ECF No. 1] PURSUANT TO FRCP 12(b)(6) and 12(b)(7)
(FIRST REQUEST)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
Plaintiff HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR3 AKA HSBC Bank USA, National Association as Trustee for NAAC 2006-AR3 ("HSBC"), together with Defendant SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") (the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree to an extension for HSBC to respond to SFR's Renewed Motion to Dismiss filed on August 23, 2018 [Doc. No. 35]. HSBC's response to the Motion to Dismiss is currently due September 6, 2018. For the convenience of the Parties and in order to address the rapidly evolving law, the Parties stipulate and agree to extend the briefing schedule and the timing for responses and replies to the Motion. The Parties request the Court extend HSBC's deadline to September 13, 2018. This is the Parties' first extension request. This stipulated extension request is sought in good faith and is not made for the purpose of delay.
Therefore, the Parties jointly agree for an extension to September 13, 2018 for HSBC to respond to SFR's Motion to Dismiss.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
