Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dorsey v. Esper, 2:18-cv-00209-APG-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180907b02 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL DEFENDANT TO FILE ANSWER (First Request) ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiff Thomas Dorsey and Federal Defendant Mark T. Esper, in his capacity as the United States Secretary of the Army, by and through their counsel of record, hereby agree that in light of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("Amended Complaint") (ECF No. 17), Federal Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) is moot. Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the parties agree th
More

STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FEDERAL DEFENDANT TO FILE ANSWER

(First Request)

Plaintiff Thomas Dorsey and Federal Defendant Mark T. Esper, in his capacity as the United States Secretary of the Army, by and through their counsel of record, hereby agree that in light of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("Amended Complaint") (ECF No. 17), Federal Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 9) is moot.

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1, the parties agree that Federal Defendant may have until July 23, 2018 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. Federal Defendant needs additional time to fully evaluate the additional allegations Plaintiff has set forth for the first time in the Amended Complaint. This is the first request for an extension of time to file an answer to the Amended Complaint.

WHEREFORE, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant the stipulation extending the deadline for the United States to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint to July 23, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer