Bank of America, N.A. v. Palm Hills Homeowners Association, Inc., 2:16-CV-00614-APG-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180914k11
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT VERN ELMER TO FILE RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA, NA.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 66] [SECOND REQUEST] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant/Counterclaimant Vern Elmer ("Elmer") by and through its attorneys Ayon Law, PLLC; Plaintiff/Counter-defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA") by and through its attorneys Gerrard Cox Larson, and Defendant Palm Hills Homeowners Association, Inc. ("Palm Hills HOA") by
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT VERN ELMER TO FILE RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA, NA.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 66] [SECOND REQUEST] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Defendant/Counterclaimant Vern Elmer ("Elmer") by and through its attorneys Ayon Law, PLLC; Plaintiff/Counter-defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA") by and through its attorneys Gerrard Cox Larson, and Defendant Palm Hills Homeowners Association, Inc. ("Palm Hills HOA") by ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIMANT VERN ELMER TO FILE RESPONSE TO BANK OF AMERICA, NA.'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [ECF NO. 66]
[SECOND REQUEST]
ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.
Defendant/Counterclaimant Vern Elmer ("Elmer") by and through its attorneys Ayon Law, PLLC; Plaintiff/Counter-defendant Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA") by and through its attorneys Gerrard Cox Larson, and Defendant Palm Hills Homeowners Association, Inc. ("Palm Hills HOA") by and through its attorneys Boyack Orme & Anthony; hereby stipulate and agree, subject to approval by the Court, to extend the deadline for Elmer to file his response to Bank of America's Motion for Summary. This is the second request for an extension.
BANA filed its Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 66] ("BANA Motion") on July 30, 2018. The deadline for Elmer's Response was moved to August 30, 2018 on August 8, 2018 by Stipulation and Order. Due to the complex schedule of Elmer's counsel, the parties have agreed to have Elmer's briefing deadline response extended.
The Parties therefore agree and STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
The deadline for Defendant/Counterclaimant Vern Elmer's Response to the BANA Motion for Summary Judgement will be moved from August 30, 2018 to September 13, 2018.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
