Woods v. City of Reno, 3:16-cv-00494-MMD-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180917668
Visitors: 13
Filed: Sep. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the parties' joint status report (ECF No. 143), filed on September 7, 2018. Given that there are not any pending discovery motions, the court will vacate the upcoming case-management conferences that were scheduled by Magistrate Judge Cooke. The parties must meet and confer and file a joint status report in 90 days. Should discovery disputes arise in the meantime, the parties may file a joint request for a telep
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the court on the parties' joint status report (ECF No. 143), filed on September 7, 2018. Given that there are not any pending discovery motions, the court will vacate the upcoming case-management conferences that were scheduled by Magistrate Judge Cooke. The parties must meet and confer and file a joint status report in 90 days. Should discovery disputes arise in the meantime, the parties may file a joint request for a teleph..
More
ORDER
C.W. HOFFMAN, JR., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the parties' joint status report (ECF No. 143), filed on September 7, 2018. Given that there are not any pending discovery motions, the court will vacate the upcoming case-management conferences that were scheduled by Magistrate Judge Cooke. The parties must meet and confer and file a joint status report in 90 days. Should discovery disputes arise in the meantime, the parties may file a joint request for a telephonic status conference that briefly outlines the nature of the discovery dispute.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
