Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bolding v. NAV-LVH Casino, LLC, 2:16-cv-00617-RFB-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180918e60 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 14, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATE FOR JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . The parties, Defendant NAV-LVH, LLC dba Westgate Las Vegas Resort & Casino ("NAV-LVH" or Defendant) and Plaintiffs CHARLES BOLDING, DONNA EHLERT, WAYNE HARRIS (collectively the "Plaintiffs"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline for filing the Joint Pre-Trial Order, currently set for Sep
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND DATE FOR JOINT PRE-TRIAL ORDER

(FIRST REQUEST)

The parties, Defendant NAV-LVH, LLC dba Westgate Las Vegas Resort & Casino ("NAV-LVH" or Defendant) and Plaintiffs CHARLES BOLDING, DONNA EHLERT, WAYNE HARRIS (collectively the "Plaintiffs"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline for filing the Joint Pre-Trial Order, currently set for September 21, 2018, as follows:

On June 26, 2018, this Court granted the parties' request to extend the discovery and dispositive motion deadlines to July 21, 2018 and August 25, 2018, respectively. [D.E. 64].

The parties have recently completed discovery in this matter, and neither party has filed a dispositive motion.

A trial date has not yet been issued in this matter.

Counsel for both parties have several matters with this Court, and with each other with several overlapping deadlines, including Kachur v. NAV-LVH, Case No. 2:16-cv-02899-JAD-CWH, and Shipman v. NAV-LVH, Case No. 2:16-cv-02722-JCM-CWH.

In Shipman, the parties are currently involved in briefing on Westgate's Motion for Summary Judgment.

In Kachur, the parties are engaged in ongoing discovery in light of recent identification of additional possible witnesses.

The additional time will allow the parties the necessary time to prepare the Joint Pre-Trial Memorandum.

Based on the foregoing, the parties request that this Court order that the deadline for the parties to file the Joint Pre-Trial Memo be extended thirty (30) days, up to and including, October 22, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer