Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:17-cv-01764-RFB-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180919d71 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITIONS TO RENEWED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTS (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., ASSET-BACK PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-R8, WHOSE ADDRESS IS 1761 EAST ST. ANDREW PLACE, SANTA ANA, CA. 92705-4934, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant THE VILLAS C
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE OPPOSITIONS TO RENEWED MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENTS

(First Request)

IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE FOR AMERIQUEST MORTGAGE SECURITIES INC., ASSET-BACK PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2004-R8, WHOSE ADDRESS IS 1761 EAST ST. ANDREW PLACE, SANTA ANA, CA. 92705-4934, ITS SUCCESSORS OR ASSIGNS ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant THE VILLAS COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ("HOA"), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby state and stipulate as follows:

Plaintiff filed its Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 47] and Defendant HOA filed its Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF 45] on August 23, 2018, making their respective oppositions due on September 13, 2018.

The parties have agreed that both Plaintiff and Defendant HOA shall have until September 20, 2018 to file and serve their respective Oppositions.

This is the first extension to which the parties have sought regarding these renewed motions. Plaintiff and Defendant HOA seek additional time due to the press of business as counsel has deadlines in this matter as well as other cases. This extension is not intended to delay these proceedings and granting Defendant's request will not prejudice any party.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED:

ORDER

Based on the foregoing Stipulation of the parties,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer