Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Noland v. Organo Gold International, 2:18-cv-01275-JAD-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180920e09 Visitors: 1
Filed: Sep. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2018
Summary: ORDER C.W. HOFFMAN, JR. , Magistrate Judge . Presently before the court is the parties' stipulated discovery plan and proposed scheduling order (ECF No. 40), filed on September 17, 2018. Under Local Rule 26-1(b)(7) & (8), the parties must certify that they considered the use of alternative dispute resolution processes, and that they considered consent to trial by a magistrate judge. Having reviewed the parties' stipulated discovery plan, the court finds that the parties have not included th
More

ORDER

Presently before the court is the parties' stipulated discovery plan and proposed scheduling order (ECF No. 40), filed on September 17, 2018. Under Local Rule 26-1(b)(7) & (8), the parties must certify that they considered the use of alternative dispute resolution processes, and that they considered consent to trial by a magistrate judge. Having reviewed the parties' stipulated discovery plan, the court finds that the parties have not included the certifications required under Local Rule 26-1(b).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties' stipulated discovery plan and proposed scheduling order (ECF No. 40) is DENIED without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file a revised discovery plan and proposed scheduling order in accordance with the Local Rules no later than October 2, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer