Albanese v. Berryhill, 2:16-cv-02350-JAD-VCF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180921d54
Visitors: 6
Filed: Sep. 19, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 19, 2018
Summary: AMENDED UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 406(b). Defendant's response is presently due on September 20, 2018 (CR 34), and Defendant seeks to extend the due date by fourteen (14) days to October 4, 2018. An ext
Summary: AMENDED UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME CAM FERENBACH , Magistrate Judge . Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. 406(b). Defendant's response is presently due on September 20, 2018 (CR 34), and Defendant seeks to extend the due date by fourteen (14) days to October 4, 2018. An exte..
More
AMENDED UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security ("Defendant") respectfully requests that the Court extend the time for Defendant to file her RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). Defendant's response is presently due on September 20, 2018 (CR 34), and Defendant seeks to extend the due date by fourteen (14) days to October 4, 2018. An extension of time is needed because Defendant's counsel needs additional time to consult with the Defendant agency in order to verify and document the amounts awarded to Plaintiff resulting from Court ordered remand, and to verify and the amounts withheld by the Defednant agency for purposes of payment of 406(b) fees. This is Defendant's first request for an extension. The motion is made in good faith with no intention to unduly delay the proceedings.
Counsel for Defendant conferred with Plaintiff's counsel, who has no opposition to this motion, on September 19, 2018.
Source: Leagle
