Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

US Bank National Association v. Villa Vecchio CT. Trust, 2:17-cv-00143-MMD-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180926e79 Visitors: 26
Filed: Sep. 24, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 43) (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . US Bank National Association, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Wachovia Bank, National Association as Trustee for Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR2 at 4801 Frederica Street, Owensboro, KY 42301 and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (together with US Bank, "Plaintiffs"), Villa Vecchio Ct. Trust ("Villa Vecchio
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO OPPOSE MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 43)

(FIRST REQUEST)

US Bank National Association, as Trustee, Successor in Interest to Wachovia Bank, National Association as Trustee for Wells Fargo Asset Securities Corporation, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR2 at 4801 Frederica Street, Owensboro, KY 42301 and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (together with US Bank, "Plaintiffs"), Villa Vecchio Ct. Trust ("Villa Vecchio"), Absolute Collection Services, LLC ("Absolute"), and The Foothills at Southern Highlands Homeowners Association (the "Foothills HOA") (together with Plaintiffs, Villa Vecchio, and Absolute the "Parties"), respectfully request the Court enter an order, pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1, extending the deadline for Plaintiffs to respond to the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Absolute and Foothills HOA (ECF No. 43) ("Motion to Dismiss"). The current deadline for any response to the Motion to Dismiss that the Parties seek to extend is currently scheduled for September 27, 2018, and has not expired. The Parties seek an extension until October 15, 2018.

This is the Parties' first request to extend the deadline for filing responses to the Motion to Dismiss and is not made for any deleterious purposes or to unnecessarily delay these proceedings. Rather, the Parties seek this extension in good faith for the benefit of the parties to discuss potential resolution of the Motion to Dismiss and to conserve party and judicial resources.

Therefore the Parties stipulate to extend the deadline for filing any response to the Motion to Dismiss until October 15, 2018, and request the Court enter an order extending the deadline.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer