Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mendoza v. Amalgamated Transit Union International, 2:17-cv-02485-JCM-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181004i21 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO FILE ANSWER (First Request) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Defendants Amalgamated Transit Union et al., by and through their counsel of record, Jacob Karabell, Esq.; and Plaintiff Jose Mendoza Jr., by and through his counsel of record, Michael Mcavoyamaya, Esq., stipulate and agree as follows: Whereas on September 19, 2018, the Court denied Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts One and Two of Plaintiff's Complaint; Whereas the
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEFENDANTS' DEADLINE TO FILE ANSWER (First Request)

Defendants Amalgamated Transit Union et al., by and through their counsel of record, Jacob Karabell, Esq.; and Plaintiff Jose Mendoza Jr., by and through his counsel of record, Michael Mcavoyamaya, Esq., stipulate and agree as follows:

Whereas on September 19, 2018, the Court denied Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts One and Two of Plaintiff's Complaint;

Whereas the deadline for the remaining Defendants to file an Answer to Counts One and Two of Plaintiff's Complaint is October 3, 2018, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4);

Whereas to accommodate Defendants' need for additional time to confer with their clients and prepare an Answer, the parties have agreed to extend the deadline for Defendants to file their Answer to October 17, 2018.

It Is Hereby Stipulated that the deadline for Defendants to file an Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint be extended from October 3, 2018 to October 17, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer