Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Terrafirma Venture, LLC, 2:17-cv-01890-JCM-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181004i23 Visitors: 6
Filed: Oct. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2018
Summary: ORDER NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is an order for counsel to show cause why they should not be sanctioned. Docket No. 54. Based on the representations in the response filed, Docket No. 55, the Court will not impose sanctions. The Court does caution counsel that they must be more diligent in accurately representing facts in their filings and that they must seek appropriate relief in the future to conduct discovery beyond the cutoff. The order to show cause is
More

ORDER

Pending before the Court is an order for counsel to show cause why they should not be sanctioned. Docket No. 54. Based on the representations in the response filed, Docket No. 55, the Court will not impose sanctions. The Court does caution counsel that they must be more diligent in accurately representing facts in their filings and that they must seek appropriate relief in the future to conduct discovery beyond the cutoff. The order to show cause is otherwise DISCHARGED.

The deposition at issue shall take place within 14 days of the issuance of this order, and the discovery cutoff is extended for that purpose only. The other deadlines remain unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer