Filed: Oct. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND CERTAIN POST-TRIAL DEADLINES PENDING POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF MATTER (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COME NOW, Plaintiff, Reginald Howard, by and through his attorneys, Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm of McLetchie Shell, LLC, along with Defendants, Aaron Dicus, Sean Bloomfield, and Gustavo Sanchez, by and through their attorneys, Adam Paul Laxalt and Frank A. Toddre II, of Nevada Attorney General's Office, and hereby
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND CERTAIN POST-TRIAL DEADLINES PENDING POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF MATTER (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . COME NOW, Plaintiff, Reginald Howard, by and through his attorneys, Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm of McLetchie Shell, LLC, along with Defendants, Aaron Dicus, Sean Bloomfield, and Gustavo Sanchez, by and through their attorneys, Adam Paul Laxalt and Frank A. Toddre II, of Nevada Attorney General's Office, and hereby ..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND CERTAIN POST-TRIAL DEADLINES PENDING POSSIBLE RESOLUTION OF MATTER
(First Request)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
COME NOW, Plaintiff, Reginald Howard, by and through his attorneys, Margaret A. McLetchie and Alina M. Shell, of the law firm of McLetchie Shell, LLC, along with Defendants, Aaron Dicus, Sean Bloomfield, and Gustavo Sanchez, by and through their attorneys, Adam Paul Laxalt and Frank A. Toddre II, of Nevada Attorney General's Office, and hereby agree and stipulate to extend certain post-trial deadlines.
First, the deadline for Plaintiff to submit a proposed order with underlying documentation as to fees and costs pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988. (ECF No. 142) shall be extended from October 5, 2018 to November 19, 2018.
Second, Defendants have filed a Motion for Relief of Judgment under Rule 59 on October 4, 2018.1 Plaintiff's deadline to respond to that Motion shall be extended until December 18, 2018.
Third, Defendants have filed an Objection to the Bill of Costs filed by Plaintiff on October 4. 2018. Plaintiff's reply, if any, to any Objection shall be due on November 13, 2018.
This Stipulation is not sought for any improper purpose or other purpose of delay, but in the interest of effectively representing Plaintiff's interests in this matter. The parties are currently discussing settlement and wish to reduce the accumulation of attorney's fees.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. The 28-day deadline put forth in FRCP 59(b) is not waivable as a jurisdictional time limit. As such, the Defendants' filed this motion to preserve their right to relief while parties were engaged in post-trial discussion for resolution.
