Filed: Oct. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 03, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its attorneys, DAYLE ELIESON United States Attorney, District of Nevada, and MARK WOOLF, Assistant United States Attorney, and Defendant, SUSAN CARTER ("Defendant, Carter") by and through her CJA attorney, YI LIN ZHENG, ESQ. of MOMOT & ZHENG, that because Defendant Carter's joint and several obligation for restitution has been satisf
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER LLOYD D. GEORGE , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its attorneys, DAYLE ELIESON United States Attorney, District of Nevada, and MARK WOOLF, Assistant United States Attorney, and Defendant, SUSAN CARTER ("Defendant, Carter") by and through her CJA attorney, YI LIN ZHENG, ESQ. of MOMOT & ZHENG, that because Defendant Carter's joint and several obligation for restitution has been satisfi..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER
LLOYD D. GEORGE, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Plaintiff, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, by and through its attorneys, DAYLE ELIESON United States Attorney, District of Nevada, and MARK WOOLF, Assistant United States Attorney, and Defendant, SUSAN CARTER ("Defendant, Carter") by and through her CJA attorney, YI LIN ZHENG, ESQ. of MOMOT & ZHENG, that because Defendant Carter's joint and several obligation for restitution has been satisfied through the forfeited assets consistent with the Ninth Circuit opinion in United States v. Carter, 742 F.3d 440 (9th Cir. 2014), she no longer has a remaining restitution obligation.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that because Defendant Carter's joint and several obligation for restitution has been satisfied through forfeited assets consistent with the Ninth Circuit opinion in United States v. Carter, 742 F.3d 440 (9th Cir. 2014), she no longer has a remaining restitution Obligation.
