Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Hall, 2:16-CR-00321-JAD-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181015a98 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 12, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING (First Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between BAILEY AARON HALL, Defendant, by and through his counsel MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ, DAYLE ELIESON, United States Attorney, and ALEXANDRA M. MICHAEL, Assistant United States Attorney, that Sentencing currently scheduled for November 13, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. be vacated and continued for 60 days or to a time convenient with the Court. This Stipulation is entere
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE SENTENCING

(First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between BAILEY AARON HALL, Defendant, by and through his counsel MICHAEL J. MICELI, ESQ, DAYLE ELIESON, United States Attorney, and ALEXANDRA M. MICHAEL, Assistant United States Attorney, that Sentencing currently scheduled for November 13, 2018 at 11:00 a.m. be vacated and continued for 60 days or to a time convenient with the Court.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. The parties agree to the continuance.

2. Defendant Hall is detained and agrees to the continuance.

3. Counsel was recently appointed and needs additional time to obtain Defendant's file from the Public Defender and to go over any issue Defendant may have.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. This is the first request to continue the sentencing.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds:

1. The parties agree to the continuance.

2. Defendant Hall is detained and agrees to the continuance.

3. Counsel was recently appointed and needs additional time to obtain Defendant's file from the Public Defender and to go over any issue Defendant may have.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance would result in a miscarriage of justice.

5. This is the first request to continue the sentencing.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The end of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendants since the failure to grant said continuance would likely result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for sentencing taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that Sentencing currently scheduled for November 13, 2018, at 11:00 a.m. be continued to January 15, 2019, at 11:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer