Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINES (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . The parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows: STIPULATION 1. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust A ("Wilmington") filed a motion for summary judgment on September 24, 2018. ECF No. 38. 2. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 9338 Wilderness Glen Avenue ("Saticoy Bay") also filed a motion for summary judgment on Sep
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINES (First Request) JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . The parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows: STIPULATION 1. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust A ("Wilmington") filed a motion for summary judgment on September 24, 2018. ECF No. 38. 2. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 9338 Wilderness Glen Avenue ("Saticoy Bay") also filed a motion for summary judgment on Sept..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND RESPONSE DEADLINES (First Request)
JAMES C. MAHAN, District Judge.
The parties, by and through their respective attorneys of record, stipulate as follows:
STIPULATION
1. Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as Trustee for Stanwich Mortgage Loan Trust A ("Wilmington") filed a motion for summary judgment on September 24, 2018. ECF No. 38.
2. Saticoy Bay LLC Series 9338 Wilderness Glen Avenue ("Saticoy Bay") also filed a motion for summary judgment on September 24, 2018. ECF No. 39.
3. Response to both motions [ECF Nos. 38 and 39] are currently due October 15, 2018.
4. The parties now require additional time to prepare responses to these motions. The motions are 24 and 25 pages, respectively, and contain numerous issues that need to be addressed in the response. The parties agree that more time is needed to fully brief these issues for the court. Therefore, there is good cause to extend the response deadline for these motions [ECF Nos. 38 and 39] to October 29, 2018.
5. This is the parties' first request for an extension of the response deadline. This stipulation is made in good faith and is not designed to unreasonably delay the resolution of this case.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
