Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Prescott v. Slide Fire Solutions, LP, 2:18-cv-00296-GMN-GWF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181023i90 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 18, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANT SLIDE FIRE SOLUTIONS, LP.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , Chief District Judge . Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiffs, DEVAN PRESCOTT and BROOKE FREEMAN (" Plaintiffs "), and Defendant, SLIDE FIRE SOLUTIONS, LP (" Defendant "), by and through the parties' respective counsel, pending the Court's approval, being that the current date for Defendant to
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND AND SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANT SLIDE FIRE SOLUTIONS, LP.'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' FIRST AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiffs, DEVAN PRESCOTT and BROOKE FREEMAN ("Plaintiffs"), and Defendant, SLIDE FIRE SOLUTIONS, LP ("Defendant"), by and through the parties' respective counsel, pending the Court's approval, being that the current date for Defendant to file a response to Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint (Doc. 29) (the "FAC") is October 22, 2018, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(3), hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE that this filing deadline shall be extended to on or before November 2, 2018.

IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that Plaintiffs' deadline to file their opposition to Defendant Slide Fire Solutions LP's anticipated Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Class Action Complaint (the "Motion") shall be on or before December 7, 2018, and Defendant will have up to and including December 21, 2018, to file its reply in support of the Motion.

This is the first extension requested in connection with this pleading and the parties do not anticipate requesting another extension as it relates to the Motion. The purpose of requesting this extension is due to the complexities of the legal issues unique to this case, which likely will involve issues of first impression to our federal bench. An extension of time will assist the parties to adequately brief these issues before this Court.

For these reasons, the parties respectfully request that this Court approve the foregoing stipulation.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Stipulation to Extend Time, (ECF No. 31), is GRANTED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer