Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Federal Housing Finance Agency v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:15-cv-02381-GMN-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181023j10 Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY (ECF NO. 70) FIRST REQUEST NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiffs Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") and Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae (collectively, Plaintiffs"), and Defendant SFR Investment Pool I, LLC ("Defendant"), hereb
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY (ECF NO. 70)

FIRST REQUEST

Plaintiffs Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") and Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae (collectively, Plaintiffs"), and Defendant SFR Investment Pool I, LLC ("Defendant"), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

Plaintiffs may have an extension of time to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to Stay Discovery, which was filed on September 21, 2018 (ECF No. 70). As a result of this Court's Order dated July 17, 2018 (ECF No. 59) establishing an expedited briefing schedule on all discovery motions, Plaintiffs' reply would be due two days after the filing of the Opposition, which would make it due on Friday, October 19, 2018. Plaintiffs request an extension of time through October 31, 2018 so that they can file a consolidated response in support of their Motion to Stay Discovery, along with their Opposition to Defendant's Countermotion to Stay Case (ECF No. 88).

This is Plaintiffs' first request for an extension of time to file their Reply in Support of their Motion to Stay Discovery, and granting this request will allow Plaintiffs to file a consolidated response, and will allow more efficient briefing on these pending motions. This extension is not intended to delay these proceedings, and granting Plaintiffs' request will not prejudice any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer