Filed: Oct. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2018
Summary: Stipulation to Continue Response Deadline (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, United States Attorney, Brandon C. Jaroch, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Ryan Norwood, AFPD, counsel for TIANNA CORDOVA: THAT THE GOVERNMENT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS (ECF No.'s 61, 64, 65, 66, and 67) currently scheduled for October 25, 26, and 29, 2018, be
Summary: Stipulation to Continue Response Deadline (First Request) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, United States Attorney, Brandon C. Jaroch, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Ryan Norwood, AFPD, counsel for TIANNA CORDOVA: THAT THE GOVERNMENT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS (ECF No.'s 61, 64, 65, 66, and 67) currently scheduled for October 25, 26, and 29, 2018, be ..
More
Stipulation to Continue Response Deadline (First Request)
RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, United States Attorney, Brandon C. Jaroch, Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Ryan Norwood, AFPD, counsel for TIANNA CORDOVA:
THAT THE GOVERNMENT'S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS (ECF No.'s 61, 64, 65, 66, and 67) currently scheduled for October 25, 26, and 29, 2018, be continued until November 2, 2018.
1. The Government needs additional time to respond to the motions based on the number of issues raised.
2. The parties do not foresee this brief continuance to have any impact on the current trial setting.
3. The parties agree to the continuance.
4. The denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
5. This is the first request to continue the response deadline.
ORDER
FINDINGS OF FACT
Based on the pending Stipulation of Counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:
1. Counsel for the Government needs additional time to in which to file responses to the pending motions.
2. The parties agree to the continuance.
3. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice.
4. This is the first request to the response deadline.
For all of the above-stated reasons, the end of justice would best be served by a continuance of the deadline to respond to the Defendant's motions.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The ends of justice would be served by granting said continuance since failure to grant said continuance would likely result in a miscarriage of justice and would deny the parties herein sufficient time and opportunity to effectively and thoroughly present their position on the motions, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that the Government's deadline to respond to the Defendant's motions, currently scheduled for October 25, 26, and 29, 2018, is vacated and continued to November 2, 2018.
