Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Edmisten v. Neven, 2:15-cv-00952-RFB-NJK. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181024m85 Visitors: 11
Filed: Oct. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2018
Summary: UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 41) (FIRST REQUEST) RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II , District Judge . Respondents move this Court for an enlargement of time of 60 days from the current due date of October 19, 2018, up to and including December 18, 2018, in which to file their Response to the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 41). This Motion is made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and R
More

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO FIRST AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF NO. 41)

(FIRST REQUEST)

Respondents move this Court for an enlargement of time of 60 days from the current due date of October 19, 2018, up to and including December 18, 2018, in which to file their Response to the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 41). This Motion is made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b) and Rule 6-1 of the Local Rules of Practice and is based upon the attached declaration of counsel. This is the first enlargement of time sought by Respondents to file this Response, and the request is brought in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

DECLARATION OF JESSICA PERLICK

STATE OF NEVADA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF CLARK )

I, JESSICA PERLICK, being first duly sworn under oath, depose and state as follows:

1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in all courts within the State of Nevada, and am employed as a Deputy Attorney General in the Office of the Nevada Attorney General. I am assigned to represent Respondents in Justin James Edmisten v. Dwight Neven, et al., Case No. 2:15-cv-00952-RFB-NJK, and as such, have personal knowledge of the matters contained herein.

2. This Motion is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

3. The Response to the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 41) is currently due October 19, 2018.

4. I have been unable with due diligence to timely complete the Response herein.

5. I was recently ordered by the state court to prepare a response by October 23, 2018, to a state habeas petition in Watson v. Howell, C-17-322212-1. Further, due to unforeseen conflicts for the originally-assigned deputies, and another member of our unit being out of the office on maternity leave, I was transferred two federal cases with impending deadlines, Williams v. Gentry, 2:04-cv-01620, and Gonzales v. Baca, 2:16-cv-02015. I am also finalizing responses to motions in a death penalty case, Bollinger v. Gittere, 2:98-cv-01263, which was transferred to me upon the retirement of the previous deputy.

6. Our unit is also responsible for responding to state petitions for writ of habeas corpus that challenge the calculation of time credits to inmates' sentences. The judicial department which handles these petitions increased the number of petitions set for hearing, and thus orders to respond, from 10/week to between 30-35/week. This has significantly increased the amount of time I have to spend working on state court petitions. I am currently assisting in the training of a new deputy to respond to such petitions, and have been responsible for review and approval of drafts.

7. I communicated with counsel for the Petitioner regarding scheduling issues, and she does not oppose this request for an extension.

8. Based on the foregoing, I respectfully request an enlargement of time of 60 days, up to and including December 18, 2018, to file the Response to Edmisten's First Amended Petition.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on this Friday, October 19, 2018.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer