Reberger v. Nevada, 3:13-cv-00071-MMD-CBC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181101d23
Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . This 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus is before the Court on motions for extension of time by both parties. Good cause appearing, the Court will grant the motions. It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 95) is granted nunc pro tunc . It is further ordered that Petitioner's first and second motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the pe
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . This 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus is before the Court on motions for extension of time by both parties. Good cause appearing, the Court will grant the motions. It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 95) is granted nunc pro tunc . It is further ordered that Petitioner's first and second motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the pet..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
This 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus is before the Court on motions for extension of time by both parties. Good cause appearing, the Court will grant the motions.
It is therefore ordered that Respondents' motion for extension of time to file an answer to the petition (ECF No. 95) is granted nunc pro tunc.
It is further ordered that Petitioner's first and second motions for extension of time to file a reply in support of the petition (ECF Nos. 98 and 100) are both granted nunc pro tunc.
Source: Leagle