Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

St. Clair v. Office Suppliers, Incorporated, 3:18-cv-0401-LRH-CBC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181101d30 Visitors: 3
Filed: Oct. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [ECF No. 8]—Second Request LARRY R. HICKS , District Judge . COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Chris St. Clair, by and through his counsel of record, Erickson, Thorpe & Swainston, Ltd., and Thomas P. Beko, Esq., and Defendants, The Office Suppliers, Incorporated, and Brianna Higgs, by and through their counsel of record, Holland & Hart LLP, and Dora V. Lane, Esq., and hereby agree and j
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT [ECF No. 8]—Second Request

COMES NOW, Plaintiff, Chris St. Clair, by and through his counsel of record, Erickson, Thorpe & Swainston, Ltd., and Thomas P. Beko, Esq., and Defendants, The Office Suppliers, Incorporated, and Brianna Higgs, by and through their counsel of record, Holland & Hart LLP, and Dora V. Lane, Esq., and hereby agree and jointly stipulate that the Plaintiff, Chris St. Clair, shall have to and until November 9, 2018, within which to file his response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint (filed October 1, 2018 [ECF No. 8]), which response is currently due on October 29, 2018. (Per Order [ECF No. 12]).

Counsel for plaintiff seeks this extension based upon the press of other matters. As was noted in the First Request for extension, the plaintiff's counsel was preparing a brief on an appeal before the Nevada Supreme court and unfortunately, this process took far more time than was initially expected. In addition, the undersigned was recently retained on two separate matters involving aviation accidents, as well as a multi-state class action suit, all of which have presented issues which require immediate attention. Because of these other matters, the undersigned has not been able to respond to the pending motion to dismiss. These issues were presented to the defendants' counsel who has graciously agreed to the requested extension.

The undersigned certifies that this stipulation is entered into in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff shall have an extension to file his response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint [ECF No.8] up to and including November 9, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED, nunc pro tunc.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer