Brown v. Berryhill, 2:18-cv-0594-JAD-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181105920
Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 31, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 31, 2018
Summary: Order Adopting Report & Recommendation [ECF Nos. 16, 17, 19] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Maida M. Brown brought this action to seek judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental income. Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe recommends that I deny Brown's motion for reversal or remand and grant the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm, after thoughtfully considering the briefing on both motions. 1
Summary: Order Adopting Report & Recommendation [ECF Nos. 16, 17, 19] JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . Maida M. Brown brought this action to seek judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental income. Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe recommends that I deny Brown's motion for reversal or remand and grant the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm, after thoughtfully considering the briefing on both motions. 1 T..
More
Order Adopting Report & Recommendation
[ECF Nos. 16, 17, 19]
JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.
Maida M. Brown brought this action to seek judicial review of the Commissioner of Social Security's denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental income. Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe recommends that I deny Brown's motion for reversal or remand and grant the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm, after thoughtfully considering the briefing on both motions.1 The deadline for Brown to object to that recommendation was yesterday, and Brown filed nothing. "[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed."2 Having reviewed the R&R, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 19] is ADOPTED in its entirety.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for reversal and/or remand [ECF No. 16] is DENIED and the Commissioner's cross-motion to affirm [ECF No. 17] is GRANTED.
The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY and CLOSE THIS CASE.
FootNotes
1. ECF No. 19.
2. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
Source: Leagle
