Smith v. James River Insurance Company, 2:18-cv-01499-JCM-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181109g46
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2018
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 13), filed on November 6, 2018. The parties request a 360 day discovery plan. The Court finds that the parties have failed to provide sufficient facts to support the proposed 360 day discovery plan. The parties must provide more detailed information to justify the proposed discovery period. The Court, therefore, denies the proposed discovery pl
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 13), filed on November 6, 2018. The parties request a 360 day discovery plan. The Court finds that the parties have failed to provide sufficient facts to support the proposed 360 day discovery plan. The parties must provide more detailed information to justify the proposed discovery period. The Court, therefore, denies the proposed discovery pla..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the parties' Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 13), filed on November 6, 2018. The parties request a 360 day discovery plan. The Court finds that the parties have failed to provide sufficient facts to support the proposed 360 day discovery plan. The parties must provide more detailed information to justify the proposed discovery period. The Court, therefore, denies the proposed discovery plan and scheduling order without prejudice. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties' Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (ECF No. 13) is denied, without prejudice.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order no later than November 16, 2018.
Source: Leagle
