De Areizaga v. New Penn Financial LLC, 2:18-cv-02072-APG-NJK. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181109g53
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 07, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2018
Summary: Order (Docket No. 6) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulation to extend the deadline to answer the second amended complaint. Docket No. 6. The parties ask the Court to extend the deadline to respond to the second amended complaint from November 2, 2018, to November 16, 2018. Local Rule IA 6-1(a) requires that the parties demonstrate that failure to file the motion before the expiration of the deadline was the result of excusable neglect. The
Summary: Order (Docket No. 6) NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulation to extend the deadline to answer the second amended complaint. Docket No. 6. The parties ask the Court to extend the deadline to respond to the second amended complaint from November 2, 2018, to November 16, 2018. Local Rule IA 6-1(a) requires that the parties demonstrate that failure to file the motion before the expiration of the deadline was the result of excusable neglect. The p..
More
Order
(Docket No. 6)
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is the parties' stipulation to extend the deadline to answer the second amended complaint. Docket No. 6. The parties ask the Court to extend the deadline to respond to the second amended complaint from November 2, 2018, to November 16, 2018. Local Rule IA 6-1(a) requires that the parties demonstrate that failure to file the motion before the expiration of the deadline was the result of excusable neglect. The parties fail to address, let alone demonstrate, excusable neglect. Docket No. 6. Accordingly, the parties' request to extend discovery deadlines is hereby DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
