Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. Bank National Association v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:17-cv-01485-JCM-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181109l12 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE (FOURTH REQUEST) PEGGY A. LEEN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rules 6-1, 26-1 and 26-4, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CSFB Mortgage Pass-Thru Certificates, Series 2005-5 ("U.S. Bank"), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"), and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") (collectively, the "Stipulating Partie
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DISPOSITIVE MOTION BRIEFING SCHEDULE (FOURTH REQUEST)

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), and Local Rules 6-1, 26-1 and 26-4, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp., CSFB Mortgage Pass-Thru Certificates, Series 2005-5 ("U.S. Bank"), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"), and SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") (collectively, the "Stipulating Parties"), by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, submit this Stipulation and Proposed Order to extend the dispositive motion briefing deadlines in this action. This is the Stipulating Parties' fourth request for extension of dispositive motion deadlines1.

The parties filed their Motions for Summary Judgment on October 12, 2018, per the operative deadlines. This is the first request for an extension to file the Oppositions. The current deadline to file Responses is November 9, 2018 and the Stipulating Parties are seeking a twelve day extension, until November 21, 2018. The Stipulating Parties also seek a one week extension of the Reply deadline. The current deadline is December 14, 2018; the parties seek an extension to December 21, 2018.

This request to extend the deadlines is made in good faith, and is not for purpose of delay or prejudice to any party, but to allow all parties to have enough time to fully brief their dispositive motions. Pursuant to LR 26-4, good cause exists to grant this request within 21 days of the Response deadline, as the parties only recently became aware within the last week that a brief period of additional time would be needed to complete the Responses.

The requested extension will not result in undue delay or prejudice to any party, as the parties previously stated in their Joint Interim Status Report [Docket No. 33] that their earliest available date for trial for this matter is April 29, 2019.

A. Proposed Schedule for Dispositive Motions

EVENT EXISTING DEADLINE NEW DEADLINE Dispositive motions October 12, 2018 Closed Response to dispositive November 9, 2018 November 21, 2018 motions Reply brief in support of December 14, 2018 December 21, 2018 dispositive motion Pre-trial order and FRCP November 9, 2018, or 30 days 30 days after decision on the 26(a)(3) disclosures after decision on any dispositive motions. dispositive motion, whichever is later.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The first request to extend the dispositive motion deadline was contained in the stipulation and order to extend discovery [Docket No. 36], entered by this Court on April 3, 2018, and the second request to extend was entered as an order of this Court on June 12, 2018 [Docket No. 62]. The third request to extend was entered as an order of this Court on August 17, 2018 [Docket No. 68].
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer