McClain v. LeGrand, 3:14-cv-00269-MMD-CBC. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181113c57
Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . For good cause shown, it is ordered that McClain's unopposed motion to file supplemental exhibits (ECF No. 62) is granted. It is further ordered that McClain's unopposed motions to seal (ECF Nos. 64, 71) are granted. The Court finds, in accordance with the requirements of Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), that a compelling need to protect the privacy and/or personal identifying information of Petitioner with regar
Summary: ORDER MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . For good cause shown, it is ordered that McClain's unopposed motion to file supplemental exhibits (ECF No. 62) is granted. It is further ordered that McClain's unopposed motions to seal (ECF Nos. 64, 71) are granted. The Court finds, in accordance with the requirements of Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), that a compelling need to protect the privacy and/or personal identifying information of Petitioner with regard..
More
ORDER
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
For good cause shown, it is ordered that McClain's unopposed motion to file supplemental exhibits (ECF No. 62) is granted.
It is further ordered that McClain's unopposed motions to seal (ECF Nos. 64, 71) are granted. The Court finds, in accordance with the requirements of Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006), that a compelling need to protect the privacy and/or personal identifying information of Petitioner with regard to the sealed exhibits outweighs the public interest in open access to court records.
Source: Leagle
