Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC, 2:15-cv-01527-JCM-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181113m33 Visitors: 1
Filed: Nov. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 09, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION JAMES C. MAHAN , District Judge . SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and U.S. Bank, N.A. ("Bank") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. Bank filed its Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying U.S. Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment on October 24, 2018. ECF No. 98. 2. SFR's Response to Bank's Motion to Reconsider is currently due November 7, 2018. 3. The parties agree to extend SFR's Response
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC ("SFR") and U.S. Bank, N.A. ("Bank") hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. Bank filed its Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying U.S. Bank's Motion for Summary Judgment on October 24, 2018. ECF No. 98. 2. SFR's Response to Bank's Motion to Reconsider is currently due November 7, 2018. 3. The parties agree to extend SFR's Response deadline to November 9, 2018.

The request is made to allow SFR sufficient time to adequately prepare the Response. This is SFR's first request for an extension of this deadline and is not made to cause delay or prejudice any party.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer