Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Sara v. Marciano, 2:18-CV-01426-APG-CWH. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181114920 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 01, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 01, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES. (FIRST REQUEST) CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Pursuant to Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for District of Nevada L.R. I.A. 6-1, 6-2, and L.R. 7-1, Plaintiff SURENDER SARA, pro se, ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, VIKING CAPITAL, L.L.C. ("Defendant") by and through its counsel hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendant to answer or other
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES.

(FIRST REQUEST)

Pursuant to Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for District of Nevada L.R. I.A. 6-1, 6-2, and L.R. 7-1, Plaintiff SURENDER SARA, pro se, ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant, VIKING CAPITAL, L.L.C. ("Defendant") by and through its counsel hereby stipulate and agree to extend the time for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint to November 14, 2018. (The Defendant and Plaintiff are collectively referenced herein as "Parties".) This is the Parties first request.

Plaintiff filed his complaint on August 1, 2018. (ECF No. 1.) Defendant subsequently served Defendant on October 1, 2018. Plaintiff has not filed a proof of service in this case. Defendant is not a California Limited Liability Company and is instead organized in Delaware. Defendant does not believe that it is the party that Plaintiff is trying to pursue in this action and is improperly named. Plaintiff believes, but is not certain, that he may have served the incorrect entity for VIKING CAPITAL, L.L.C., and may be pursuing the wrong business entity with the same name as the entity that he is trying to pursue.

The Parties therefore stipulate to this extension for Defendant to file their answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint for Damages while both Parties exercise due diligence in trying to resolve whether or not Plaintiff is pursuing the proper business entity. Defendant shall answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's complaint by November 14, 2018.

This requested extension of time is sought in good faith and not for purposes of causing any undue delay.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer