Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Clark v. Mirage Casino Hotel, Inc., 2-18-cv-00392-APG-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181116c64 Visitors: 8
Filed: Nov. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF 21 ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Plaintiff, WILLIAM CLARK, by and through his undersigned counsel, KIRK T. KENNEDY, ESQ., and the Defendant MIRAGE CASINO HOTEL, INC., by and through its undersigned counsel, LISA A. McCLAINE, ESQ., of the firm of Jackson Lewis P.C., that the Plaintiff's response to the Defendant's motion for summar
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, ECF 21

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Plaintiff, WILLIAM CLARK, by and through his undersigned counsel, KIRK T. KENNEDY, ESQ., and the Defendant MIRAGE CASINO HOTEL, INC., by and through its undersigned counsel, LISA A. McCLAINE, ESQ., of the firm of Jackson Lewis P.C., that the Plaintiff's response to the Defendant's motion for summary judgment, ECF 21, is presently due by November 21, 2018. Plaintiff's Counsel needs additional time to complete the response and the parties stipulate to extend the response deadline to November 28, 2018.

This is the first request by stipulation for an extension of time for the Plaintiff's response to the Defendant's motion for summary judgment. There have been no previous requests by motion to extend this filing deadline, as well.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer