Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Vegas Property Services Inc., 2:17-cv-01463-MMD-PAL. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181126b65
Visitors: 7
Filed: Nov. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 21, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OT TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO SPANISH TRAIL MASTER ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (" Wells Fargo "), by and through its attorneys, Jeffrey Willis and Nathan G. Kanute of the law firm of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P., and Defendant Spanish Trail Master Association (the " HOA "), by and through its attorneys, Sean Anderson and Ryan D. Hastings, of the law firm,
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OT TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO SPANISH TRAIL MASTER ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (FIRST REQUEST) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (" Wells Fargo "), by and through its attorneys, Jeffrey Willis and Nathan G. Kanute of the law firm of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P., and Defendant Spanish Trail Master Association (the " HOA "), by and through its attorneys, Sean Anderson and Ryan D. Hastings, of the law firm, ..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OT TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO SPANISH TRAIL MASTER ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
(FIRST REQUEST)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. ("Wells Fargo"), by and through its attorneys, Jeffrey Willis and Nathan G. Kanute of the law firm of SNELL & WILMER L.L.P., and Defendant Spanish Trail Master Association (the "HOA"), by and through its attorneys, Sean Anderson and Ryan D. Hastings, of the law firm, Leach Kern Gruchow Anderson Song, hereby stipulate that Plaintiff may have through and including December 7, 2018 within which to file a response to the HOA's motion to dismiss first amended complaint. The motion to dismiss was filed by the HOA on November 9, 2018 and a response is currently due November 23, 2018.
Counsel requested an extension of time because of the Thanksgiving holiday and the need for additional time to review the motion to dismiss. Additionally, the Parties are continuing to discuss the potential for a resolution of this matter. Accordingly, good cause exists for the extension of time.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
