Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Bank of America, N.A. v. Huffaker Hill Unit No. 2 Residence Association, 3:15-CV-00502-MMD-WGC. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181128f37 Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO OPPOSE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO SET DEADLINE FOR REPLY BRIEFS. [Second Request] MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants Bank of America N.A. ("BANA"), Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") and Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA") (collectively "Plaintiffs"), Defendant, Huffaker Hill Unit No. 2 Residence Association (the "Association"), and Defe
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR DEFENDANTS TO OPPOSE PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND TO SET DEADLINE FOR REPLY BRIEFS.

[Second Request]

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiff/Counter-Defendants Bank of America N.A. ("BANA"), Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") and Federal Housing Finance Agency ("FHFA") (collectively "Plaintiffs"), Defendant, Huffaker Hill Unit No. 2 Residence Association (the "Association"), and Defendant/Counterclaimant, Nadina Beverly, Trustee for the Beverly-Blair Trust No. 7 ("Beverly"), by and through the parties' respective counsel, to extend the deadline for Beverly to oppose Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment filed on October 15, 2018 ("Motion" at Doc. No. 60) to November 27, 2018, and the deadline for Huffaker to oppose the Motion to November 30, 2018.

Both Defendants' oppositions to the Motion are currently due on November 21, 2018. Good cause exists to extend the deadlines for the reason that Beverly's counsel has been out of the office sick, and as a result requires a few additional days in which to prepare, and for the reason that Huffaker desires to coordinate its opposition with Beverly's and requires a few additional days beyond the filing of Beverly's opposition in order to do so.

In consideration of the above extension, the parties further stipulate that Plaintiffs shall have through December 21, 2018, in which to file their respective reply briefs to both Association's and to Beverly's opposition briefs, in support of their Motion. Plaintiff's current deadline to file their reply is December 12, 2018.

This is the Parties' second request for an extension regarding Beverly's opposition and to set a deadline for the filing of any reply briefs and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED in the above-captioned case (Case No.: 3:15-CV-00502-MMD-WGC).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer