Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Garner, 2:18-cr-0317-JAD-VCF. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20181129e08 Visitors: 20
Filed: Nov. 28, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REVIEW OF DETENTION ORDER PURSUANT TO U.S.C. 3145(b) (First Request) JENNIFER A. DORSEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, United States Attorney, by and through Brandon Jaroch, and Mace J. Yampolsky, Esq., counsel for Defendant Glen Garner that: 1. Defendant Glen Garner be granted an extension of time up through and including December 20, 2018 to file his Motion for Review of Detention Ord
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR REVIEW OF DETENTION ORDER PURSUANT TO U.S.C. § 3145(b) (First Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Dayle Elieson, United States Attorney, by and through Brandon Jaroch, and Mace J. Yampolsky, Esq., counsel for Defendant Glen Garner that:

1. Defendant Glen Garner be granted an extension of time up through and including December 20, 2018 to file his Motion for Review of Detention Order Pursuant to U.S.C. § 3145(b). 2. Defendant's Motion is currently due Monday, November 26, 2018. 3. Defendant is in need of additional time because Defendant is in the process of obtaining germane information to be considered by this Court. 4. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. 5. This is the first request to continue the time for Defendant to file this motion. 6. Defense and Government counsel agree that the proposed continuance is sought in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court hereby finds that:

1. Defendant's Motion for Review of Detention Order Pursuant to U.S.C. § 3145(b) is due November 26, 2018. 2. Defendant is in need of additional time because Defendant is in the process of obtaining germane information to be considered by this Court. 3. The Defendant is in custody, and agrees to this extension of time. 4. Denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. 5. This is the first request to continue the time to file the Motion. 6. Defense and government counsel agree that the proposed continuance is sought in good faith and not for purposes of delay.

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant Glen Garner shall have up through and including December 20, 2018 to file his Motion for Review of Detention Order Pursuant to U.S.C. § 3145(b).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer