Gruia v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, 2:18-cv-02107-JCM-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181205d28
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 04, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR CHASE BANK USA, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Andrei Gruia and defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase") stipulate and agree that Chase may have up to and including January 3, 2019 to respond to plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1), to provide time for the parties to investigate plaintiff's allegations and discuss the potential for an early resolution, and, if needed, for Chase to prepare a respon
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR CHASE BANK USA, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Andrei Gruia and defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase") stipulate and agree that Chase may have up to and including January 3, 2019 to respond to plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1), to provide time for the parties to investigate plaintiff's allegations and discuss the potential for an early resolution, and, if needed, for Chase to prepare a respons..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR CHASE BANK USA, N.A. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Andrei Gruia and defendant Chase Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase") stipulate and agree that Chase may have up to and including January 3, 2019 to respond to plaintiff's complaint (ECF No. 1), to provide time for the parties to investigate plaintiff's allegations and discuss the potential for an early resolution, and, if needed, for Chase to prepare a response.
This is the parties' first request to extend this deadline, and it is made in good faith and not for purposes of delay.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
