McNamara v. Selling Source, LLC, 2:17-cv-02969-GMN-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20181212d57
Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2018
Summary: ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER PENDING RESOULTION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Defendants having previously sought a stay of discovery and other deadlines pending a ruling on their motions to dismiss; the Court having recently transferred this case to a new district judge; and Plaintiff no longer opposing a stay; the Court finds good cause for and hereby does enter a stay of discovery and all other court deadlines pending a ruling on D
Summary: ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER PENDING RESOULTION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . Defendants having previously sought a stay of discovery and other deadlines pending a ruling on their motions to dismiss; the Court having recently transferred this case to a new district judge; and Plaintiff no longer opposing a stay; the Court finds good cause for and hereby does enter a stay of discovery and all other court deadlines pending a ruling on De..
More
ORDER STAYING DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER PENDING RESOULTION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO DISMISS
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants having previously sought a stay of discovery and other deadlines pending a ruling on their motions to dismiss; the Court having recently transferred this case to a new district judge; and Plaintiff no longer opposing a stay; the Court finds good cause for and hereby does enter a stay of discovery and all other court deadlines pending a ruling on Defendants' previously filed motions to dismiss. The Court finds that the Parties' requested stay is consistent with the objectives of Rule 1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which directs that the Rules shall "be construed and administered to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action." Any remaining Parties will submit a revised proposed discovery and scheduling order for the Court's consideration within fourteen (14) calendar days after the pending motions to dismiss have been resolved.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that discovery is STAYED pending the court's ruling on defendants' motion to dismiss (ECF No. 53).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendants' motion to stay discovery (ECF No. 62) and the parties' request for a status conference (ECF No. 76) are DENIED as moot.
Source: Leagle
